1.
Can the brain
change the brain,
ending the latter's
tyrannous reign?
The incorrigible
gene needn't feign
mastery over every
act or lofty thought
because its power,
strong as gravity,
goes unnoticed
and is all too easy
to maintain.
2.
But if the brain is
the brain, then
who or what is
doing the shaping?
It's true the brain
looks like clay, but
better minds know
taking hands to that
fatty mass will mess
with all its delicate
circuits and relays.
3.
Maybe the brain
can change
the brain.
It's undeniable that
the brain
gains both mass and
insight by
running the gauntlet
of life (hopefully
with a
resilient helmet).
4.
Without being
the same, umpteen
trains of thought
worm their way
adroitly through
gray matter as if
it were an apple.
And just as worms
burrow into fruit,
words and forms
enter the brain,
blending and then
coalescing until
they reach a final
amalgamation.
But then there's
no way to tell
what's what, and so
that just adds to all
the mystification.
5.
Some say thoughts
are what train
the brain - but
then where do
thoughts come from?
Do they float
idly through the ether,
drifting toward
a webbed encephalon?
Or do bits seep
out of dense marrow,
condense into
an intense nodule
unable to wait for
tomorrow, embedding
itself into the brain
with earnest compulsion?
6.
Is the brain for us or
against us? Is there
even an us separate from
soma, axon and dendrite
multiplied a billionfold
in an organ whose folds
are home to neurons
more fecund than that
pump house of sperm?
Speaking of tails, there's
a clue that may help us
sift through this whole
mess. Myth may come to
our aid, provide context for
what appears to be a
conundrum for some. The
ouroboros is an ancient
serpent depicted devouring
its own tail, and yet it lives,
eternally. It's a primitive
cybernetic feedback loop.
Our brain may be like this,
even though at times it
gets frenetic and can make
one of your eyelids droop.
But the brain is not behind
an Iron Curtain, and the
ouroboros contains no
bits that are ferrous...
7.
Some will still assert
that because we don't know
what makes neurons start
or ideas flow, there must be
a ghost somewhere in the machine.
Some won't even dare to flirt
with the can of worms, preferring
to stay mum or even inert.
Another side is less harmless,
those who confidently insist
that empiricism is best, and so
even dare to tell us there is no us.